Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

How to Find Good Stem Cell Treatment: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

POSTED ON IN Latest News Regenexx Provider Network Research Presentations/Publications stem cell therapy Videos BY Chris Centeno

With the explosion in the number of doctors offering stem cell treatments, I’m sure you’ve wondered how to find a doctor that knows what they’re doing. This is a video of a talk I just gave at a stem cell conference in the Bahamas. In it I used five guidelines to define the good, the bad, and the ugly of stem cell therapy. If your provider meets these guidelines, he or she falls under the “good.” If your provider does not, it’s a good idea to keep shopping. These five guidelines for high-quality stem cell care are what patients should be able to expect. And, regrettably, they’re usually not getting these things.

Guidelines: How to Find Good Stem Cell Treatment

  1. Candidacy grading
  2. Expert treatment
  3. Animal models for investigational care
  4. Data collection via registry for every treated patient
  5. Transparent and Peer-Reviewed publication of Data

Let me explain these more in depth.

Candidacy Grading

Candidacy grading seems pretty simple. Most every medical procedure ever devised has a candidacy associated with it. Either the patient’s a good candidate, a fair candidate, or a poor candidate. The problem is that most stem cell providers don’t do this; everyone’s a candidate who’s got a credit card that works. This is absolutely insane. We candidacy grade our patients, and all providers should. If you are a poor candidate, your provider should be able to look you in the eye, and say, “You know what? You’re a poor candidate for this procedure. I don’t see any downside to you trying it, but I think it’s unlikely to work.”

Candidacy grading should be based on data that’s being collected. For instance, we know that someone with severe hip arthritis would make someone a poor candidate for same-day stem cell treatments. There are a number of other things that would make a patient a poor candidate, and providers need to be able to communicate this to their patients. Again, no medical procedure ever invented has anything approaching a 100% success rate. THIS INCLUDES STEM CELLS! If your doctor classifies everyone as a good candidate, run…

Expert Treatment

If you’re going to spend a lot of money on a stem cell procedure, then your doctor had better be an expert in the area he or she is treating. You don’t want your plastic surgeon, who knows how to inject Botox into your face, injecting your knees. You don’t want a family doctor treating a complex neurologic condition that he or she knows little about. You don’t want a burned out ER doctor treating complex cardiac diseases. So in figuring out how to find good stem cell treatment, you should expect that your doctor is an expert in the area that he or she is treating.

Stem cells are not magic pixie dust to be wielded by physicians who have no expertise or advanced knowledge of the disease they’re treating. Specialists in specific areas must remain in the fields they know and understand, and stem cells are no exception!

Animal Models for Investigational Care

If you’re going to have stem cell treatment, you really need to expect that there is an animal model showing promising results using that specific stem cell type. This means that the specific stem cell type being used has be shown to be effective in an animal that has that disease. Many times in fat stem cells, otherwise known as stromal vascular fraction (SVF), this isn’t happening. We’re seeing fat stem cells being offered for all sorts of things that we don’t have any idea, using animal modeling, that fat stem cells would be helpful for, which is inappropriate.

Many applications for which SVF is being used have no animal models showing success. One example is SVF for urological care. There are many other examples (see the video for the table I created of medical diseases where have no evidence that SVF will work). There needs to be at least one animal model that shows promising results using the specific cell type (bm-MSCs, ad-MSCs, SVF, BMC, etc.) before a doctor begins treating a patient.

Data Collection via Registry for Every Treated Patient

Patients should be tracked at set time points—usually one month, three months, six months, and every single year after treatment. This is called a registry. A registry is not a phone call to the patient after treatment or giving them a form to fill out after treatment; it’s pinging them at set time points to see how the procedure went, and it’s using validated outcome metrics to make sure that what we’re seeing is a real effect.

You need to have a really big team set up to collect registry data correctly. Not only do you need to have an electronic system of pinging patients, you also need to have live people calling the patients who don’t respond or having patients fill out their forms when they are in the clinic.

Transparent Reporting of Data

There should be transparent reporting of data, which we rarely see online. What do I mean by that? All data, not just cherry-picked, needs to be reported online (or explained why it was excluded and what was excluded). We do this once a year and offer tools for our 35 sites to slice and dice their own data versus the overall means reported by all clinics. It takes a lot of energy and effort, but it’s well worth it.

In addition, peer-reviewed publication of data should occur. What does that mean? This means that your doctor needs to publish their data on their stem cell treatment in medical journals. This can begin with lower level studies like case reports leading to case series and comparison trials leading eventually to higher level studies like randomized control trials (RCTs). If your doctor says “I’m not a researcher,” then he or she shouldn’t be offering investigational care like stem cells. If they tell you something like “I don’t have the money,” these types of studies are relatively cheap to perform.

The upshot? Using the five guidelines to determine how to find good stem cell treatment by vetting stem cell providers will help you properly navigate the murky stem cell waters. If you want to dig really deep into the good, the bad, and the ugly of stem cell therapy, including how these guidelines can be enforced, be sure to watch my video (containing the material I covered in my lecture this week at Regenera Global in the Bahamas) included at the top of this post.

    comments

    Jeanne says

    Very good information.
    Question: is their a stemcell treatment for a prolapse bladder?

    replies

    Chris Centeno says

    Jeanne,

    Thanks! Our practice uses stem cells to treat Orthopedic Conditions, exclusively. A good place to look for current research on medical conditions would be PubMed.

    replies

    Norlene Hopkins says

    I have something wrong with my left knee, i don't konw what is wrong yet, how could you help me.

    replies

    Chris Centeno says

    Norlene,
    We are an Interventional Orthopedic Regenerative Medicine practice. We find the cause of joint issues and treat both the cause, and the resultant issue with your own platelet and stem cells. Here is how we treat various knee issues.http://www.regenexx.com/the-regenexx-procedures/knee-surgery-alternative/ To see what we could do in your particular case, we would need to determine what the problem is, and what caused it. If you have an current MRI, you can go through the initial Candidacy process by submitting the Candidacy form, if not, an in person exam would be required.

    replies

    Add comment

    Your comment will be revised by the site if needed.

    About the Author

    Chris Centeno

    Christopher J. Centeno, M.D. is an international expert and specialist in regenerative medicine and the clinical use of mesenchymal stem cells in orthopedics. He is board certified in physical medicine as well as rehabilitation and in pain management through The American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.…

    View Profile

    Search Blog

    Categories