Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Low Back Disc Stem Cell Results: Summary of Regenexx-C Treated Low Back Discs

POSTED ON IN Back and Neck Procedure Outcomes Back/lumbar Infographics Latest News Regenexx-C BY Chris Centeno

low back disc stem cell

What do low back disc stem cells results look like 4-6 years after treatment? In 2005 we began treating our first low back discs with stem cells. We expected to see what the animal models predicted, i.e. significant changes in MRIs-basically new discs regrown from stem cells. Regrettably that didn’t happen as we soon learned that the animal models researchers were using bore little resemblance to the real patients with degenerative disc disease we were seeing in the clinic. Over the next few years we did learn how to use cultured stem cells to help patients with disc bulges pressing on nerves and who couldn’t be managed with conservative treatments. This technology relies on cultured stem cells, so it’s not available in the U.S., but instead only through third party licensees who operate in countries where this type of culture isn’t regulated as a drug. We are working with a third party company to bring this technology through the regulatory hoops in the U.S.

A few weeks ago, I spent a huge amount of time going through all of our charts for treated stem cell disc patients. Some were treated with the second generation of what we believed was best to treat low back discs and some with a later third generation protocol. In addition, none received what we now consider our fourth generation protocol to improve the targeting of the cells in the areas that we believe will respond the most favorably. In addition, while we took great care to ensure that most of these patients only had low back disc pain, low back pain can be caused by discs, nerves, facet joints, SI joints, muscles, ligaments, etc… As a result, some patients had good results with their disc pain, but still had other pain that needed to be addressed. Note that I was able to update many of these follow-ups to the 4-5 plus year mark post-procedure.

The upshot? This infographic is a good example of the Regenexx difference. It contains the kind of details that you can dig up in smaller datasets (i.e. details about each patient) and still present in a manageable form. It shows a ground breaking technique in evolution, but still amazing in that many of these patients avoided big surgeries by a simple injection of their own stem cells. In addition, it’s not hype, but a careful, deliberate, and transparent reporting of the data as it was collected. As always, click on the thumbnail above for a bigger PDF.

    *DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.
    Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.


    comments for this post are closed

    About the Author

    Chris Centeno

    Christopher J. Centeno, M.D. is an international expert and specialist in regenerative medicine and the clinical use of mesenchymal stem cells in orthopedics. He is board certified in physical medicine as well as rehabilitation and in pain management through The American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.…

    View Profile

    Search Blog