Can the concept of knee arthritis narcotics
be a good idea in anyone's book? There has been a very disturbing trend in pain management these last few years, with more and more long acting narcotics coming on the market to treat pain. The companies making these medications have convinced some physicians that these long-acting narcotics are much less addicting than their short acting cousins, but regrettably this isn't really the case. In our experience, once a patient starts down this path, it's very difficult to get them off these medications. While these medicines can be life savers for patients with cancer pain or untreatable severe pain, for conditions that can be treated in other ways (like knee arthritis), they are a very poor choice. From a business standpoint, the problem with cancer pain and untreatable non-cancer pain is that these are relatively small markets, so the drug manufacturers have their sights set on bigger and more lucrative markets. Enter knee osteoarthritis, which affects many more patients. I have blogged on addictive narcotics being used to treat knee arthritis
and now there's more "research" being published that this is a "good idea" (usually by consultants for the drug companies manufacturing these addictive drugs). This recent paper treated knee arthritis patients with high dose narcotics (extended release oxycodone like Oxycontin) happened to be published by the manufacturer of the medication
. In particular, most patients were titrated to 40 mg of oxycodone a day, a dose equivalent to 8 Percocet tablets a day! While these high doses of narcotics seemed to work, one has to ask the question, with many options for these patients such as traditional knee replacement (we're not big fans of the procedure for many patients, but it does beat being addicted to narcotics), hyaluronic acid injections, prolotherapy, platelet rich plasma, and our favorite - stem cells, why would a doctor want to get a patient addicted to high dose narcotics? Your guess is as good as mine!